🔗 Share this article

Accepting the need for change

The Portuguese coach's chosen wing-back setup isn't the root cause of the Red Devils' struggles. The club are bouncing back from years of poor stewardship and the existing team is still developing, with strengths in some areas while glaring deficiencies remain elsewhere.

That said, systemic issues exist within the current tactical approach, particularly underloads in central areas and width problems that require immediate attention. Other coaches have successfully managed analogous problems – the Italian manager at Stamford Bridge and the Austrian coach at Selhurst Park prove that on-field intelligence proves more important than pre-match setups.

Amorim recently stated: "The tactical setup isn't at fault, our performances are," akin to focusing on effects rather than causes. Opposing teams have regularly exposed the same weaknesses in Amorim's approach for multiple months, not resulting from player misunderstanding but due to the approach itself contains inherent flaws.

Consequently, fans shouldn't expect an instant solution where all pieces connect, much like big-money transfers will not instantly resolve the underlying issues. Brentford's recent performance functions as an ideal illustration – although they lost their head coach and crucial performers during the break, they modified their formation deliberately to target the Red Devils' consistent system.

When the former Ajax coach arrived at Old Trafford, it became apparent that Dutch league achievements wouldn't translate to the English top flight; his inability to adjust was fundamental in his final downfall. Presently United's coach – who appears to possess the complete skill set for management's greatest challenge other than versatility – is repeating identical mistakes and wasting a golden opportunity. For the first time Old Trafford possesses owners focused on winning trophies rather than commercial interests.

Modifying defensive roles

Wide central defenders play crucial roles in Amorim's system: they drive into midfield, perform defensive interventions, patrol defensive channels, switch play, initiate attacks and join offensive phases. Any football expert might wonder whether employing a duo of such versatile players in a three-man defense makes sense when a four-man defense could solve central problems.

At the moment, these defenders are being pinned by opposing attackers who, by standing nearby, hinder them from supporting central areas as the approach necessitates. This development enables clubs with midfield overloads to circumvent the middle third, causing pressing concerns that require resolution.

Potential fixes include ordering stoppers to push forward anyway – but this might create vulnerability at the back – or withdrawing the attacker to improve build-up play, sacrificing attacking threat but utilizing his carrying ability. The most sensible change involves altering United's pressing structure from the existing high-risk formation to a traditional midfield four that provides better coverage and avoids the necessity for defenders to advance.

Bringing back the young midfielder

Amorim's preferred style of chaotic direct football requires United to empty central areas and depend on direct passes, counting on individual brilliance rather than organized offensive moves. Although expected goals data suggest improvement, eyewitness accounts reveal that current chance creation come mainly from penalty awards and hopeful shots rather than organized offensive play.

Successful sides manage proceedings through rhythm management. The team's incapacity to accomplish this isn't completely attributable on Amorim's approach; reports indicate he sought new midfielders during the summer window but faced opposition from management hierarchy. Beyond fault allocation, the present circumstance proves unworkable.

The manager's first-choice pairing of Casemiro and Bruno Fernandes, with Manuel Ugarte providing cover, has limited opportunities for the young Englishman. Despite valid reservations exist about his strength progression and progressive passing, excluding such talent raises questions about the approach's validity.

The current midfield options embody high-tempo football, whereas the youngster provides rhythm variation. At Sporting Lisbon, his squad could launch early attacks due to talent disparity against domestic competition, confident they would regain control if possession turned over. Yet in England's top division, the competitive level means poor retention gets punished immediately, while athletic superiority by itself doesn't ensure victory.

The youngster's ball mastery impresses observers, and while partnering him with Fernandes creates defensive concerns, these issues become secondary in a controlling side. Accounting for current statistics showing they surrender better opportunities than any league rival, including the youngster seems worth attempting as other solutions have already failed. Although questions persist about his precise contribution in Amorim's approach, consistent minutes represents the best development path and could hardly worsen present conditions.

Maximizing flank contributions

Down the right flank, the partnership of the Ivorian and Cameroonian could prove effective given their similar characteristics of vision, awareness and tenacity. When supported by the right-sided centre-back, they should establish a productive relationship that enhances attacking options. Currently however, fixed roles makes them easy to defend for structured teams.

United's coach should install organized interchange routines that create uncertainty through frequent role switching. Service into wide areas should vary considerably – not always to feet but often into space to maximize attacking momentum. This tactic allows central penetration, bypassing opponents and generating opportunities for attempts on goal or deliveries.

On the opposite flank, Patrick Dorgu often obtains opportunities in attacking zones even without the technical refinement to exploit successfully. Changing his starting point slightly deeper would leverage his tackling and driving runs to {supply more creative players|service better attackers|provide for